The Statbot

Techmeme "Discussion" Links AllTime Leaderboard from The Statbot

May 13th, 2008 · 5 Comments

The Techmeme Leaderboard, CrunchBase Bloggerboard and my own All-Time Techmeme Leaderboard only take into account the Headlines on Techmeme. However, most of the interesting discussion happens in the, err, Discussion Links. So, I consider them as important, if not more important, than the headlines.

But, there is no Leaderboard for the Discuss Links. Until now, that is. Here it is:

Rank Site Links Presence
1 http://blogs.zdnet.com

4260

0.030912

2 http://digg.com

3261

0.023663

3 http://blog.wired.com

2597

0.018845

4 http://mashable.com

2560

0.018576

5 http://www.engadget.com

2280

0.016545

6 http://gizmodo.com

2202

0.015979

7 http://www.webpronews.com

1975

0.014331

8 http://www.techcrunch.com

1882

0.013656

9 http://www.paidcontent.org

1722

0.012495

10 http://arstechnica.com

1540

0.011175

11 http://valleywag.com

1530

0.011102

12 http://www.news.com

1473

0.010689

13 http://www.alleyinsider.com

1338

0.009709

14 http://www.downloadsquad.com

1199

0.0087

15 http://crunchgear.com

1120

0.008127

16 http://searchengineland.com

1089

0.007902

17 http://techdirt.com

1020

0.007401

18 http://www.computerworld.com

979

0.007104

19 http://gigaom.com

978

0.007097

20 http://venturebeat.com

958

0.006952

21 http://www.mathewingram.com

905

0.006567

22 http://www.marketingpilgrim.com

884

0.006415

23 http://www.tuaw.com

829

0.006016

24 http://www.techspot.com

813

0.005899

25 http://blogs.guardian.co.uk

791

0.00574

26 http://www.theregister.co.uk

753

0.005464

27 http://www.dslreports.com

727

0.005275

28 http://www.readwriteweb.com

716

0.005196

29 http://www.eweek.com

708

0.005138

30 http://blogs.barrons.com

675

0.004898

31 http://news.yahoo.com

647

0.004695

32 http://www.businessweek.com

611

0.004434

33 http://news.com.com

606

0.004397

34 http://blog.insiderchatter.com

598

0.004339

35 http://www.webware.com

595

0.004318

36 http://www.crunchgear.com

591

0.004289

37 http://www.parislemon.com

590

0.004281

38 http://svextra.com

590

0.004281

39 http://blog.searchenginewatch.com

585

0.004245

40 http://www.electronista.com

582

0.004223

41 http://www.ipdemocracy.com

571

0.004143

42 http://newteevee.com

571

0.004143

43 http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com

562

0.004078

44 http://www.searchenginejournal.com

559

0.004056

45 http://www.macuser.com

549

0.003984

46 http://blogs.business2.com

546

0.003962

47 http://tech.blorge.com

545

0.003955

48 http://www.joystiq.com

544

0.003947

49 http://gesterling.wordpress.com

533

0.003868

50 http://www.neowin.net

524

0.003802

51 http://www.macsimumnews.com

523

0.003795

52 http://www.podcastingnews.com

516

0.003744

53 http://jkontherun.blogs.com

501

0.003635

54 http://www.gadgetell.com

493

0.003577

55 http://www.centernetworks.com

492

0.00357

56 http://scobleizer.com

490

0.003556

57 http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com

485

0.003519

58 http://www.nytimes.com

482

0.003498

59 http://www.watchmojo.com

475

0.003447

60 http://slashdot.org

462

0.003352

61 http://www.moconews.net

438

0.003178

62 http://www.pcworld.com

434

0.003149

63 http://techreport.com

426

0.003091

64 http://watchmojo.com

425

0.003084

65 http://www.infoworld.com

423

0.003069

66 http://crave.cnet.com

421

0.003055

67 http://news.digitaltrends.com

412

0.00299

68 http://blog.tmcnet.com

409

0.002968

69 http://www.i4u.com

407

0.002953

70 http://www.lostremote.com

406

0.002946

71 http://www.gottabemobile.com

402

0.002917

72 http://www.901am.com

402

0.002917

73 http://kotaku.com

400

0.002903

74 http://broadstuff.com

399

0.002895

75 http://www.dailytech.com

393

0.002852

76 http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com

392

0.002844

77 http://www.bloggingstocks.com

388

0.002815

78 http://www.dailywireless.org

383

0.002779

79 http://googlesystem.blogspot.com

363

0.002634

80 http://blogs.chron.com

363

0.002634

81 http://www.deepjiveinterests.com

363

0.002634

82 http://www.ubergizmo.com

363

0.002634

83 http://www.hunterstrat.com

360

0.002612

84 http://www.intomobile.com

356

0.002583

85 http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com

346

0.002511

86 http://www.p2pnet.net

330

0.002395

87 http://www.betanews.com

328

0.00238

88 http://blogs.pcworld.com

325

0.002358

89 http://weblogs.macromedia.com

323

0.002344

90 http://www.profy.com

321

0.002329

91 http://www.engadgetmobile.com

316

0.002293

92 http://www.boygeniusreport.com

310

0.002249

93 http://tech.cybernetnews.com

307

0.002228

94 http://www.gizmodo.com

299

0.00217

95 http://www.thealarmclock.com

299

0.00217

96 http://biz.yahoo.com

298

0.002162

97 http://www.sfgate.com

297

0.002155

98 http://blogs.siliconvalley.com

293

0.002126

99 http://www.informationweek.com

292

0.002119

100 http://markevanstech.com

288

0.00209

       

This one is way more different from the AllTime Headlines Leaderboard, and contains several surprises.

First, Techcrunch isn’t No.1. They are No.8. Engadget, Gizmodo, Mashable, Wired Blog all pass over it (Gizmodo should actually be ranked higher than Engadget, since there is a duplicate “with” the www. at No.94 with 299 posts). Surprising for me, WebProNews, a site I have not visited even once in my 4 years of internet life (no offense to the fine folks there), beat TechCrunch. Is this because whenever TechCrunch discusses something, it becomes the Headline?

Note that No.1 in this list, ZDNet Blogs, includes a host of bloggers. Digg and Slashdot appear here, while they are absent in the Headlines leaderboard. Natural, since Digg and /. are places of “discussion”.

Also, I think this one has more “unknowns” in it than popular ones. Mainstream media is either absent or considerably lower down (NYTimes is 54th!). LouisGray says discussion links are where the copy cats live(update: He says some are copycats, not all). Comments?

P.S. I’m working on making charts comparing the distribution of “power” in both the lists. Also, if I do a “Discussion Authors Leaderboard”, the results are surprising. Stay tuned. This should be interesting…

Tags: Leaderboards · Techmeme

5 responses so far ↓

  • 1 louisgray // May 13, 2008 at 1:10 pm

    To be clearer… now that I’m being quoted… it’s common that the Discussion links come from either lesser-known publications, who don’t have as many links coming their way, or they are following the original news, and linking to that. That’s where you’d come up with the copy angle. But most are legitimate.

  • 2 Cyndy Aleo-Carreira // May 14, 2008 at 5:16 am

    *sigh* Louis, you should have quit while you were ahead. ;)

    Having shown up several times in “Discussion” links when my article had little or nothing to do with the headline, I do take offense to the “copy” issue. And as a blogger, it gets tiring when I’m repeatedly told I’m supposed to live and die by Techmeme. I write about what interests me. Period.

  • 3 The Embargo Breaks: The Regurgitation of a Press Release - Profy.Com // May 14, 2008 at 8:30 am

    [...] StatBot just posted a Techmeme leaderboard for discussion links. If I do happen to actually peruse Techmeme, those are the links I head to for the most part, and [...]

  • 4 Josh Catone // May 14, 2008 at 9:54 am

    You should create a leaderboard that takes into account both discussion and headline links. I.e., total presence. That would be interesting to see.

    @Louis: I had sort of the same idea: this is the “echochamber list” (that thought was mostly tongue-in-cheek).

    @Yuvi: If you do the combined list, be sure to take into account that sometimes headline links fall to discussion — and vice versa.

  • 5 Techmeme All Time All Links Leaderboard from The Statbot - The StatBot - Fun stats. Visualizations. Leaderboards. // May 16, 2008 at 10:09 am

    [...] Techmeme "Discussion" Links AllTime Leaderboard from The Statbot